ABSTRACT
Background : Climate change has been described as the largest public health concern of the 21st century. In response to climate change over 50 countries have pledged to go carbon neutral in the provision of health care service and telemedicine can be an integral part of decreasing emissions related travel associated with health care. While telemedicine rapidly expanded to increase access to care during the Covid-19 pandemic, the impact of telerehabilitation on climate change as part of the provision of physical rehabilitation services has not been assessed. This study focuses on physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians in an urban physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) department and assesses patient satisfaction with synchronous video visits (SVVs) as well as the estimated value of SVVs in travel savings and carbon emissions. Materials and Methods : We conducted a retrospective chart review, implemented a patient survey, and conducted a commuter analysis to report our experience using SVVs to provide follow-up care across multiple rehabilitation sub-specialties Results : A total of 154 SVVs were conducted before the pandemic over an 18-month period. The most commonly addressed issues during the SVVs were rehabilitation and medication management, followed by equipment, lab and imaging results. About one-third of the patients (31%) were non-ambulatory at the time of their SVV. On average, SVVs reduced travel distance (95 miles), travel time (2.23 hours), travel cost ($15) and carbon emissions. Discussion : The use of telerehabilitation should be an integral part of decreasing the carbon footprint of provision of physical medicine and rehabilitation services.
ABSTRACT
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread effects on healthcare and society at large. There are limited data on the impact of the pandemic on the long-term recovery of the burn survivor. This study aims to compare physical and psychosocial outcomes of the burn survivor population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data from the Burn Model System National Database (2015-present) were analyzed. Data were divided into pre- and during-pandemic groups (before and after March 1st, 2020). Outcomes were compared at four cross-sectional time points: 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after burn injury. The following patient reported outcome measures were examined: SF-12 Health Survey, PROMIS-29, Post-Traumatic Growth Indicator, Community Integration Questionnaire, Patient Civilian Checklist, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Burn Specific Health Scale, NeuroQOL Stigma, 4-D Itch, and CAGE Questionnaire (drug/alcohol misuse). Given the cross-sectional design, potential differences in clinical and demographic characteristics were examined for each group at each time point. Adjusted mean outcome scores at each time point were compared between groups using a two stage multi-variable regression model with propensity score matching. For each time point, subjects from each group were matched. The propensity score was calculated using the following matching variables: gender, age, race, ethnicity, etiology, length of stay, and burn size. The mean score difference of outcomes within each matched sample was examined. Results Sample sizes varied by time point with a range from 420 at 6 months to 94 at 60 months. The during-COVID group comprised 10% of the total sample size. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the groups at any time point. There were no significant differences between the groups in adjusted mean outcome scores across the different time points. Conclusions This preliminary examination showed no differences in myriad long-term outcomes at multiple time points after injury among burn survivors before and during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results may suggest an element of resilience, however given the sample size and cross-sectional limitations further investigation is required to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on the burn population.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the functional impairments of a cohort of patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after surviving severe COVID-19 illness, in order to better understand the ongoing needs of this patient population. METHODS: This study consisted of a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and admitted to a regional inpatient rehabilitation hospital from April 29th to May 22nd, 2020. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and complications from acute hospitalization were examined. Measures of fall risk (Berg Balance Scale), endurance (6 Minute Walk Test), gait speed (10 Meter Walk Test), mobility (transfer and ambulation independence), cognition, speech and swallowing (American Speech and Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System Functional Communication Measures) were assessed at rehabilitation admission and discharge. RESULTS: The study population included 29 patients and was 70% male, 58.6% white and with a mean age of 59.5. The mean length of acute hospitalization was 32.2 days with a mean of 18.7 days intubated. Patients spent a mean of 16.7 days in inpatient rehabilitation and 90% were discharged home. Patients demonstrated significant improvement from admission to discharge in measures of fall risk, endurance, gait speed, mobility, cognition, speech and swallowing, (p< 0.05). At discharge, a significant portion of the population continued to deficits in cognition (attention 37%; memory 28%; problem solving 28%), balance (55%) and gait speed (97%). CONCLUSION: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after hospitalization with COVID-19 demonstrated deficits in mobility, cognition, speech and swallowing at admission and improved significantly in all of these domains by discharge. However, a significant number of patients exhibited residual deficits at discharge highlighting the post-acute care needs of this patient population.